Historic solar eclipse could
prove our star is hundreds
of miles larger
The sun could be much bigger than we think, Nasa scientists
have claimed. Pictured is sun with active regions combined
- Researchers that study solar eclipses believe the sun is
- larger than we think
- Modelling suggests sun could be a few hundred miles
- larger than believed
- This year's solar eclipse, which falls on August 21,
- could prove their predictions
have claimed.Researchers studying the shadows cast during
a solar eclipse believe they have found evidence suggesting
our star has a far larger radius than previously believed.
And this year's historic solar eclipse, which falls on August 21,
could prove that we've been underestimating the size of the sun
for almost 200 years, the researchers said.
Researchers believe they have found evidence suggesting our
star has a far larger radius than previously believed
(pictured is a stock image of a solar eclipse)
In 1891, a German astronomer known as Arthur Auwers
was the first to estimate the size of the sun.
Based on the star's photosphere, the body of the sun whose
wavelengths are visible to the naked eye, he calculated that
the sun had a radius of 432,470 miles (696,000km).
This benchmark figure was widely used until 2015, when
the International Astronomical Union updated this figure to
432,280 miles (695,700km) based on data from
solar-observing satellites.
But now a growing number of scientists have claimed that
both of these estimates are too small.
Xavier Jubier, a researcher from Antony in France who
creates detailed models of solar and lunar eclipses for
Google Maps, said his observations suggest the sun
is bigger than we think.
As part of his work, he predicts where the shadow
created by a solar eclipse will fall on Earth.
He noticed that something was wrong with the sun's
measurements while he was comparing his previous
eclipse predictions with photos taken during historical
solar eclipses.
Mr Jubier was able to match the location of the photographs
to that predicted by his models - but only if he scaled by
the sun's radius by a few hundred kilometres.
'For me, something was wrong somewhere, but that's
all I could say,' Mr Jubier told Space.com.
And Ernie Wright, a researcher from Nasa's Goddard Space
Flight Center in Greenbelt, Maryland, who also creates
precise models of solar eclipses, found himself in a
similar dilemma to Mr Jubier.
He too found that he could only make his models match
reality if he increased the size of the sun in his calculations.
The sun could be much bigger than we think, Nasa scientists
have claimed. Pictured is sun with active regions combined
to look something like a jack-o-lantern’s face
The researchers hope this year's upcoming eclipse, which
will likely be the most-watched solar eclipse in history, will
provide a chance for scientists to verify the size of the sun.
A group of scientists plan to study the eclipses' 'contact time',
the time when the moon will cover the sun for a given location,
to help them figure out the star's size.
Normally, researchers use the radius of the sun to predict
the length of contact time during an eclipse - and it is believed
that these calculations could be reversed to help
scientists predict the size of the sun.
'If we can measure contact times accurately, everything else
being the same, the only thing that can change is the solar
radius,' Luca Quaglia, a physicist and eclipse researcher
from the American Astronomical Society, told Space.com.
'We can actually compute the solar radius that way.'
The team plan to to use 'flash spectrum' photography,
which uses a textured grating over a camera to split
incoming wavelengths of light.
By doing this, they can easily determine the precise moment
contact time is initiated during the eclipse, they said.
And by combining this information with accurate time stamps,
they will be able to make an accurate prediction of the
size of the sun, they claimed.
'The more observations we have the better even if they
are not providing the kind of quality we expected
to get,' Mr Jubier said.
'Time will tell what we can make of all this.'
No comments:
Post a Comment